The poem starts with an African probably wanting to buy a house or to rent it for a place to stay. But when the African told the landlady he was an African, the attitude of the landlady turned and did not want to sell the house to him anymore. The poem shows colours of the skin. Beside the colour of the skin, the colour also signify racism.
The poem starts with the African who liked the conditions of the house or apartment and that he is willing to buy or rent. But after he told the landlady he loved the house, he made a confession that he was an African. The word "confession" made it seems like the skin colour of the African was something he had done wrong. This shows that the colour signify racism.
Besides that after the speaker had confess, the landlady asked the question "how dark?". This clearly shows that the colour shows racism. From the first stanza of the landlady wanting to rent or sell the house or apartment to the speaker now turns the attitude of the woman in the second stanza. The lady was silence when the African "confess" that he was an African. This shows that the landlady was stunned was she heard that the buyer was a black and the attitude of her quickly changed and that she is not that willing to sell the house to the African. This shows colour of racism.
After the first question, the speaker did not answered. The speaker started to be angry been she is judging his skin colour and probably because of that, she is not willing to sell the house to him. The landlady asked again the same question. This time it made the speaker more angry and the speaker gave her tthe answer of "West African sepia". The lady did not understand and asked back a question of "Is it black?". This shows that the landlady thinks that Africans are always black and this shows that colour of racism.
In conclusion, the colour in the poem not just signify skin colour but also racism , that is owned by the landlady.
Q2
The dialogue in the poem shows different characteristic in both the African and the landlady. It shows the landlady of being racism and not polite, but it shows good characteristic of intelligence and polite in the African.
In the first stanza of the poem, we can see that the African is polite and intelligence. After the African "confessed" that he was an African. The African still described the reply of the landlady as good as possible with "Pressurized good-breeding", "Lipstick coated, long gold rolled". This shows that the African is polite and intelligence as the African used complex words like "Pressurized". This all shows that the African is polite and intelligence.
In the second and third stanza, its shows the landlady's "unpoliteness" and "unpolite" and also the Africans intelligence. After the confession, the landlady replied with a "how black". This clearly shows that the landlady is racism and also not polite to the African. It shows an irony of the conversation. If the African was going to buy the house, he and the landlady shoulkd be discussing about the price, but instead they are discussing the colour of the skin which clearly shows the that the landlady is racism. The second stanza also shows difficult words used by the African to described the surrounding of the African during the conversation. This clearly shows that the African is well-educated and intelligence.
In the last stanza, it show the intelligence of the African. In the end of the poem the African describes the colour of him that he had "blonde palm and sole", "brunette facial" and a "black raven bottom" to the landlady because the landlady asked. And after that the African end the conversation with a "would you rather see for your self?" to the landlady and this shows that the African is intelligence.
In conclusion, the whole poem shows that the the African is intelligence with the difficult words used by the African and the landlady in racism from the attitude changed after the African confessed about his skin colour.
3Q
The poem starts with a conversation of an African and a landlady discussing about the house that the African is interested. But after the confession, the landlady probably decided not to sell the house to the speaker. But after the conversation, the African in the end won the conversation.
In the end of the poem after the confession, the landlady asked "how black" is the African twice and this made the African mad and gave the reply of "West African Sepia". The landlady did not understand and though that all Africans were black. This can be seen by the reply made by the landlady of "that's dark, isn't it?" But after the African describes the colour of him. He ended the conversation with a "wouldn't you rather see for yourself?" . This sentences shows sarcastic behind the meaning of it.
In conclusion, the way the African reacted showed that the African was well-educated and that the African won the conversation in the end.